I don't think the objection in these articles is that porn is being viewed accidentally, per se (although given that one of those articles seems to frame fashion pictures as 'porn' that might be debatable), more that it is very *easy* for children to get hold of - and that I certainly can't argue with. In my own childhood years one had to rummage under parents beds, hunt through the more permissive sorts of second hand book shops and con newsagents into parting with 'naughty' material. All a kid has to do these days is figure out how to turn safe search off.
It is the following argument '...and therefore it should be banned entirely' that I think is ridiculous. Hence the comparison with other things that aren't child-appropriate.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2015-04-09 10:36 pm (UTC)It is the following argument '...and therefore it should be banned entirely' that I think is ridiculous. Hence the comparison with other things that aren't child-appropriate.